TBAY: Evil! McGonagall Revisited (WAS: Who Will Betray the Order?
erinellii
erinellii at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 31 18:22:30 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 83919
A forlorn shout echoes across Theory Bay, "Elkins! Elkins! Are you
here? Elkins! They've forgotten EverSoEvil!McGonagall!"
There is no sound in Theory Bay except the wind and the waves
lapping the shoreline, and so this echo is able to carry out over the
water, all the way to the deck of the Imperius!Arthur trimaran, where
it is heard by Erin, who immediately leaps into a rowboat and heads
for shore in hopes that the Elkins will show. As she paddles, she
hears other snatches of echoes from the mysterious speaker.
"Ever So Evil! McGonagall lives! Don't be fooled by surface
evidence! Yes, I know the conventional wisdom is that McGonagall
came into her own in OOP. McGonagall is shown to be a faithful member
of the order *and* an effective fighter against Umbridge. But I'm not
convinced. Not at all.
"I go back to Elkins' brilliant analysis of ESE McGonagall.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/39470
Elkins' brilliant analysis... Erin snorts quietly to herself. ALL of
Elkins' analyses are brilliant, even when they're complete bull.
That is just the sort of writer that Elkins is, and is also why Erin
has all the main ones printed out and bound in a green folder which
she takes with her nearly everywhere she goes. But the ESE!McGonagall
theory is one with which Erin has never been able to completely agree.
Oh it has its brillant points, of course...but there is one glaring
flaw which Elkins dances brillantly around.
Erin reaches the shore and climbs out, her red hair flashing in the
sun. She looks up and down the shoreline and spots Debbie, who is
standing on a scaffold near the souvenir stand. Erin giggles
quietly. Doesn't Debbie know that particular scaffold was erected to
execute discredited theories? Oh, the irony. Sadly, however, there
is still no sign of Elkins.
Debbie is still going on about McGonagall's actions in OoP, and Erin
listens calmly until she hears a good point at which to break in.
"Take, for example," Debbie is saying, "the scene where Umbridge
sends Harry to McGonagall with the note informing her of the
detentions. I don't know what's in those ginger biscuits but the
entire scene is a bit suspicious to me. Look closely at McGonagall's
reactions.
What does McGonagall focus on? It's the fact that Harry told
Umbridge that Voldemort had returned. That's what sets her into
orbit. We don't learn till later, though, that Voldemort is devoting
all his energies to finding other people to break into the DoM and
steal the prophecy because Voldemort doesn't want to do anything that
might provide evidence for the MoM while they are blithely ignoring
his return. But Evil!McGonagall knows this."
"Um, excuse me," Erin interrupts. "But we DO already know this!
Perhaps not the part about finding people to break into the DOM, but
certainly we know Voldemort doesn't want the MOM to realize he's
back. Sirius tells Harry that in Ch. 5, for goodness sake. It's the
very *first* thing he tells him after inviting him to ask questions.
And by the time McGonagall tells Harry to be careful, everyone who
believes in Voldy's return must surely know that he's trying to stay
under cover, because otherwise he would have shown himself. It's
really kind of self-evident. The kind of thing McGonagall doesn't
have to be Ever So Evil in order to know.
"And I really don't understand WHY you think Evil! McGonagall would
even be upset about Harry telling Umbridge that Voldy is back.
Because the Ministry isn't supposed to know? But surely you realize
that this isn't new information for Umbridge. She already knows that
this is what Harry believes! She's been sent to surpress him and
Dumbledore. She's not going to hear "Voldy's back" from Harry and
say "He is! Oh no! How can I join the resistance?!"
"No; the reason McGonagall (Good, not Evil) wants Harry to "be
careful" is that his acknowledgement of Voldemort's return opens him
to reprisals from Umbridge. Just look at what has been done to
Dumbledore for saying the exact same thing that Harry is saying. DD
is voted out of the Chairmanship of the International Confederation
of Wizards. He is demoted from Chief Warlock on the Wizengamot. He
is accused of losing his grip. There's talk about taking away his
Order of Merlin, First Class.
"And look at what's been done to Harry so far. He's gotten
detention, had his hand sliced open, and been thought crazy by most
of the class. I don't think it's at all suspicious that Good!
McGonagall tells him to "be very careful". In fact, if I were Evil!
McGonagall, I'd do exactly the opposite. I'd tell him "The truth
will set you free, Harry. Shout it from the rooftops!" and then
stand back and laugh as he got expelled and carted off to the loony
bin."
"Well, moving on," says Debbie loudly. "McGonagall's actions are
not *for* the Order; they are *against* Umbridge. What does she do
for the Order, anyway? Name one thing she did other than to fight
Umbridge."
Erin opens her mouth, but before she can say anything, Debbie hastily
admits:
" Ok, when Harry-the-snake attacks Arthur Weasley, McGonagall *says*
she believes Harry, and she does take him to Dumbledore. But when
it's time to explain to Dumbledore? She says Harry had "a nightmare.""
Erin shrugs. "Well, he did, didn't he? Besides, look at that scene
again.
"Professor Dumbledore, Potter has had a... well, a nightmare," said
Professor McGonagall. "He says..."
"See, McGonagall doesn't WANT to use that word, nightmare. She
searches for something that will convey the importance of the vision
a little better, just can't find it quickly enough and has to
settle.
"And as for other things she's done for the order, you pointed out
one yourself a little earlier:
"We next see McGonagall intercepting Harry in the hallway when he
escapes History of Magic with the injured Hedwig in tow. What does
McGonagall do there? She chastises Harry for using Hedwig to
communicate with Sirius, because of the ministry spies at Hogwarts.
Yes, indeed, McGonagall doesn't want the MoM getting their hands on
information that Sirius is in London when they're using up so much
energy hunting for him in Albania - instead of looking at the
evidence of Voldemort's return."
"I say again, the ministry already knows about Voldemort's return.
Sirius-hunting or not, that's not going to change. McGonagall has
done what she should her- protected the hiding place of the Order.
"And how about the way she got blasted trying to help Hagrid? Name me
one reason why an evil minion would do that," Erin finished happily.
But Debbie is not yet vanquished:
"I submit there's nothing in OOP that resolves the questions Elkins
raised!"
"McGonagall's part in the battle against Umbridge does not
counterbalance her suspicious behavior in allowing the Dementor to
soul-suck Barty Crouch, in refusing to celebrate the downfall of
Voldemort and all the other evidence Elkins laid out in her first
Evil!McGonagall post."
"Yes," says Erin. "But the first time I read that post, something
sruck me. A horrible flaw. I think Errolowl said it best at the
time."
errolowl:
About the only niggle I get is: Why would Voldmort need Fake! Moody
in the first place, since Evil! McGonagall was already in perfect
position? Does he not know about Minerva then? Is she ever-so-loyal
to Voldmort without actually letting him know she's on board?
"The only answer I ever saw to this question was someone suggesting
that McGonagall was super-duper undercover, or something of that
nature. Well, Elkins' theory has her cooperating with Quirrell and
Crouch Jr., so she can't have been all that secret. And I think at
the time Voldemort was desperate enough to have used her no matter
how super-duper secret-agent you make her out to be," says Erin.
Debbie's voice is beginning to show signs of hoarseness.
"What did you say? Do you think Ever-So-Evil McGonagall is far-
fetched? Think ye perhaps that she's missed too many opportunities
already to deliver Harry to Voldemort? How about this kinder and
gentler alternative?
"Maybe there was a relationship between McGonagall, but of a
different kind: not the Dark Lord and his devoted servant, but a
relationSHIP. Indeed, Elkins quotes Porphyria, who flatly suggested
they were lovers without presenting one shred of evidence. But that
doesn't mean there isn't any. We must rely on inferences, but I can
find them.
"Come to think of it, why don't we just package both theories
together?"
"Because," says Erin, "one is plausible and one is not. I like the
idea of the relationSHIP. I'll buy that one. Also, if you like,
I'll buy you a drink for your throat. And then maybe we can talk
about Evil!Bill, the REAL traitor-in-waiting."
> Debbie bows to Erin, steps down off the scaffold, and they both set
off for the Royal George.
Erin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive