Snape and Harry WAS Re: Pensieves objectivity AND: Dumbledore's integrity
melclaros
melclaros at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 4 13:41:50 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 79795
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "msbeadsley" <msbeadsley at y...>
wrote:
>
> The *words* can be demanded (and that will result in tremendous
> success, I'm sure), but the respect the words imply must be
*earned*;
> something Snape seems oblivious to or bent on ignoring.
me:
Mea Culpa. Silly me insisting that my own children address their own
teachers by their titles starting on the very 1st day of school.
Silly me for Never, ever (are you listening, Sirius?) using the name
I used for my son's 2nd grade teacher in private or among other
parents of children in that witch's class to pass my lips in a
child's presence.
Silly, silly me. Those kindergarten teachers damned well should have
EARNED the right to be called MISS Espey and Miss (damn i can't even
remember her name!) Stupid of me to insist that he addrewss the 2nd
grade nazi as MRS (name witheld--only because if i type it i'll start
screaming).
But it doesn't surprise me, I took flack for years for being the
only "Mommy" in the playgroup who insisted her children address EVERY
adult with a courtesy title until instructed otherwise by THAT adult.
>>
> And how do you expect the student to remember that this "is STILL a
> student/teacher relationship" when the teacher side of that pair
has
> consistently stepped outside of appropriate behavior *for that
> relationship*?
me:
This hardly news for Harry. He'd have had far more trouble keeping
his teacher/student priority wits about him had Snape suddenly gone
all warm and fuzzy on him. :::shudders in disgust:::
Snape has behaved like a schoolyard bully, drawing
> lines in the sand and daring Harry to step over. (I suppose now
> you'll say he learned that from James. No matter; it isn't JAMES
> he's retaliating against.)
me:
Nope, Snape's a b*st*rd all on his own. I've never claimed otherwise
despite what I've said to defend him.
>
> Snape (dam*ed if *I'll* call him by any title) set the tone for
> what's followed when Harry WAS eleven.
>
me:
Which is why it never ceases to amaze me why people are always so
surprised when Snape lives up to his own standards. I could see it if
he'd suddenly turned bi-polar, but this started on Day One (as
listees continuously point out to me and others. We KNOW!) What we
don't know is why, after FIVE years of this Harry (and others) are
still surprised.
>
> My understatement alarm (now added to my formerly shrieking dark
> detectors ^-^) is blaring now.
ke:
Dark alarms, sneakoscopes, I'm sure they're all howling.
>>
> The historic wrongs Snape did Harry have not been resolved. To me,
> Snape will be a baby-bashing thug until they are.
>
me:
"He'd never forgive Snape." I don't have the book here, but you know
to what I'm referring. Harry has a LOT of reasons to hate Snape. But
he has very, very few (I'm being generous) to mistrust him. Snape did
not in any way, shape or form, kill Sirius. If Harry had used his
head for one minute and gone to Snape OR ingored Snape and used the
tool Sirius HIMSELF provided him, there's a good chance SB would
still be sulking around 12 Grimmaud.
Yup, there are issues here, that is for damned sure. But there's a
LOT of work to be done on Both Sides.
>
> No excuse needed. Just human nature.
No, no NO! You know what? If my son (13) had come home whining that a
teacher had tossed him (physically) out of his office, I'd ask
him "What did YOU do to deserve that?"
If the answer was, "Read his diary the minute he was called out of
his office on an emergency" you can rest assured a jar of roaches
would have been the LEAST of his worries. You'd be amazed how fast a
kid can march when followed by an irate parent. Severus Snape has
nothing on a p*ss*d off Mom.
He'd have stood in that office until he'd managed a suitable apology
and I'd have signed the "referral" papers for his
detention/suspension right in front of him.
YES, I have. IRL. Want the details? And it was for nothing like
reading a diary either.
But this is likely generational. When I was in school if we got in
trouble we got in trouble again, worse, at home. Now (and I work in a
school, I see this every day) if a student so much as looks at a
student cross-eyed (in the student's opinion) we have parent's
marching into the office with lawyers.
A medicine cabinet is not a diary--and a pensieve is in my mind a
diary squared.
Inexcusable. Absolutely inescusable. I blame Dumbledore, quite
honestly. Harry'd never seen a Pensieve before he snooped in DDs. It
should have been explained then (to the little idiot) that SOME
people MIGHT consider them PRIVATE.
>
> "More" fun? Harry didn't even know the name "Snivellus" before he
> looked in the pensieve;>
Me
Oh yes he did. Sirius used that name at Grimmaud when the Occlumency
topic was 1st brought up. Interesting that in all the endless
comments of the "overgrown teenager Snape" and "arrested development
Snape" he never resorted to namecalling with "Paragon of Maturity
Sirius". Even as snarky as he got, he never descended to that level
IN FRONT OF A STUDENT. Let's talk inexcusable. Sirius, as much as he
hates Snape, is an adult <snort>. He should NEVER, EVER have used
that name in front of Harry. If you argue that point I'm going to go
tell my son what I called his 2nd grade teacher while he wasn't
around.
>
> P.S. Possible epiphany tucked in here: if, as I have read a theory
> stating, Harry is actually carrying a part of Voldemort around with
> him behind his scar, could it be that Snape's abuse of Harry is
> intended as an object lesson (from BOTH perspectives) for that
scrap
> of Voldemort
Me:
That's interesting, but honestly I think if Snape wants to abuse
Voldemort he's waiting for a really good opportunity to do so
properly. Hurling roaches won't do. It is possible however that
he "pours it on" in front of Harry/Voldy to keep his cover up.
Melpomene, who really can't understand why people keep expecting
Snape to be nice. I LIKE him and I don't expect him to be nice.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive