Dumbledore Survives! Was Albus Dumbledore and LONG
msbeadsley
msbeadsley at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 11 05:31:07 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 80440
Robert Jones wrote:
> I hate to be a downer, but I think DD will die in Book 7 before the
> final battle. He has to survive through Book 6 to have his talk at
> the end with Harry, but JKR made him appear older in OOTP. And
> when the final showdown between Harry and LV occurs, Harry has to
> go up against LV alone (hopefully with Godric Gryffindor's sword,
> because, well, I like swords). For Harry to be a real hero, he
> can't have DD around as a safety net.
So, in LOTR, since Gandalf was still around after the defeat of
Sauron, Frodo wasn't a "real hero"?
(I agree that JKR made Dumbledore seem older in OoP. But, IIRC, she
has included at least one mention of his age/tiredness in *every*
book after PS/SS.)
There are a number of ways I can think of to have both hero!Harry and
survivor!Dumbledore and I shall enumerate them here, dealing once and
for all with all the nihilists out there who seem to want a higher
body count <kidding!>:
Dumbledore is critically injured and not certain to survive when the
final battle occurs. Ways this could happen are thus:
--Fawkes will die and we find Dumbledore had a near-vital bond with
the bird (as Voldemort may have with Nagini), making him helpless as
he recovers from the loss.
--Dumbledore may be betrayed by someone he trusts and turns his back
on at the wrong time, making a long stay in St. Mungo's necessary.
--Dumbledore may come so close to death that everyone thinks he is
dead; he could be saved by Fawke's magic, a one-time use only ability
which destroy Fawkes (and could make Harry and Voldemort's wands no
longer effective--nah). Harry may know only that Dumbledore
is "killed," not that Fawkes saves him.
Dumbledore knows that the prophesy does not include *him*. He may
trade his ability to be available for Harry during the final battle
if he sees a way to get great earlier gains for it in the overall
war, as follows:
--Dumbledore may succumb to using an unforgivable curse in battle or
under some other extreme conditions and allow himself to "come along
quietly" to Azkaban, where he will remain until after the final
battle. (But only if Fudge remains Minister of Magic.)
--Dumbledore may age so very much more (possibly due to treachery) in
Book 6 that he and Harry both know he can be no more fighting help to
Harry; or Harry may have to put his foot down in Book 7 and tell
him, "I can't be worrying about you and conquering Voldemort at the
same time! Go warm your feet by the fire and stay out of the way!
(Aside: Sit on him, Dobby!) I want to give you socks for Christmas
and have you say the service at my wedding!" (for all you shippers)
--Dumbledore may trade himself under an agreement of non-resistance
to the DE for a group of hostages (just where *is* Penelope
Clearwater these days?) and spend the time until after VM and the DE
are vanquished as a prisoner/hostage; he could end up like the
Longbottoms. (Oh, wait, a higher body count *is* better.)
--Dumbledore may trade himself as hostage for an opportunity for
Harry to escape certain death. (Harry may have to make the same
decision that Dumbledore may have made: *no one* is indispensable.
Dumbledore could then escape as/just after Harry brings down
Voldemort.)
Dumbledore is missing and presumed dead, only to return after the
final battle is over, which could happen thus:
--Aberforth "doubles" for his brother in order to give Albus the
upper hand via the element of surprise. Aberforth is killed but
Albus survives; no one else knows of the switch. Dumbledore may even
deliberately let Harry think he is dead if he thinks that is what
Harry needs to believe.
--Dumbledore leads a force against an opposing force of dark wizards
we haven't seen yet: Durmstrang parents/graduates, meeting them
halfway between Durmstrang and Hogwarts, and mops them up only in
time to join the final post-Voldie-go-boom celebration.
Dumbledore is forced to remain passive because a magic "bomb" has
been wired to go off under Hogwarts sometime in Harry's final year if
Dumbledore uses more than a minimum of magic, anyone tampers with it,
or any significant number of students leave the grounds. (Filch
helped the terrorists plant it; he just hasn't been the same since
the centaurs roughed up his crush, Dolores Jane.)
I could go on. JKR is nothing if not full of surprises. If she
wants Dumbledore to come out of this okay and can write it that way
without sacrificing (there's that word again) narrative tension and
integrity, I think she will. She doesn't seem to me to be nearly as
bloody-minded as many of her fans.
Sandy, aka "msbeadsley"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive