Source for that quote (WAS: Re: The Phoenix Must Die)
urghiggi
urghiggi at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 22 03:40:44 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 81274
urghiggi wrote:
>
> > What I THINK she said was something along the lines of "I don't want to
talk
> > too much about my religious beliefs because then it would be too easy for
> > people to figure out where the books are going." She did not mention
> > Christianity per se, either in re her own beliefs or people's ability to see
> > where she's going.
Derannimer replied:
> See the quote below. (And JKR's said multiple times, actually, that she is a Christian,
> and she's a member of the Church of Scotland.)
> snip. then quote from the JKR interview being discussed:
>> > Is she a Christian?
> > ``Yes, I am,'' she says. ``Which seems to offend the religious right far
worse than
> > if I said I thought there was no God. Every time I've been asked if I believe
in God,
> > I've said yes, because I do, but no one ever really has gone any more
deeply into it
> > than that, and I have to say that does suit me, because if I talk too freely
about that
> > I think the intelligent reader, whether 10 or 60, will be able to guess what's
coming
> > in the books.''
>
Thanks for the quote and also to Geoff for the additional info he posted later
about the interview -- Ottawa was sticking in my mind too, but darned if I can
find a current link to the thing. Anyway I appreciate seeing the wording of the
quote again, and thanks, Derannimer, for tracking it down. I'd never dispute
that JKR's a Christian -- in fact I previously posted here chunks of a different
JKR interview discussing that very same thing. I was only wanting to re-
examine the particular quote above -- where it says merely that if she talked
more about her beliefs beyond saying she believed in God, then the
"intelligent reader" (not just Christian ones) would find it too easy to predict
her M.O. I didn't mean by my reply that she failed to acknowledge her
Christianity -- only that in this particular quote she was talking about simply
"believing in God" as having a strong bearing on the reader's ability to figure
out the plot. Sorry I didn't word that more clearly in my post .... I don't really
think we have a disagreement here, other than clarifying that she seemed to
be saying that she didn't think it would only be Christians who might have a
good shot at figuring out where she was going if she was more forthcoming
about her theology.
I find all of this ironic in light of some off-list correspondence I recently had
with another HPfGU member (not a Christian) who said something along the
lines of being able to "see a church by daylight" (when reading the books)
even if many of JKR's fellow Christians can't ....
Re pip!squeak's comments about what WAS it in CoS that came nigh to
"giving it all away," I've always harbored the suspicion that perhaps it was the
bold climax of the thing, which is the only section of books 1-5 that I'd be
comfortable really labeling as allegory (and Christian allegory at that). John
Granger's "Hidden Key to Harry Potter" offers a convincingly argued
allegorical interp of this passage. (Briefly involving HP as everyman, LV as
satan, the basilisk as sins threatening to overwhelm everyman, Fawkes as
Christ helping everyman overcome his sins and saving him from a certain
death, and HP rising with Fawkes as everyman rises with Christ.... that's a
bare-bones outline, but you get the idea.) In light of JKR's preferred strategy of
avoiding overt religious references in the work -- perhaps she herself thought
in retrospect that this passage came perilously close to blowing her cover???
Of course the "secret of CoS" could just be some obscure twist involving
Moaning Myrtle or deathday rituals or Colin Creevy's camera or Gilderoy's
charming smile -- who knows? Time (and books 6 & 7!) alone will tell....
Urghiggi, Chgo
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive