Death Eaters

[Hagrid]

No: HPFGUIDX 81368

--- "Potterfanme" <fc26det> wrote:
> --- "Hagrid" <aussie_lol> wrote:
> > See http://www.hp-lexicon.org/death_eaters.html 
> > three dead :
> > - Rosier (GoF 27 + 30)
> > - Wilkes (GoF 27)
> > - Regulus Black (OotP 6)
> > 
> > Cowardly or Left Forever
> > - Snape **
> > - Karakoff 
> > Faithful Servant
> > - Barty Couch Jr
> 
> Aussie,
> Do you think Regulus is one of the dead?  I just figured that since 
> LV killed or had him killed that he didn't count as one that he 
> would mention in a mournful way.  I figured he would think of him 
> as just so much waste.  Just curious...
> Susan

Susan, 
LV may not have ordered Regulus's death. 

This mention of that extra dead DE adds to my suspitions that Snape 
may have done a lot of underhanded things and remains faithful to the 
Dark Lord.

Sirius had no idea Severus was ever a DE. Therefore, Regulus would 
have also been suprised when he recognised Snape there. He was only a 
year or 2 behind Padfoot at Hogwarts, so knew about the friction 
between Sirius-Snape well. 

OF course, this arguement is also true if Wormtail was recognised.

- If LV included Regulus 
- If Regulus was killed without LV direction
- then there is much more to learn about that extra dead DE

> When did we find out that the goblins had gone over to LV side? I
> thought that bill was working on getting them on DD side? Did I 
> miss some really big part of the book?
> Eowynn 

The goblins do have a problem with the wizards loyal to MoM (OotP 4, 
5, 9). Hagrid said, "so yeh'd be mad ter try an' rob it (Gringotts), 
I'll tell yeh that. Never mess with goblins, Harry." Goblins are very 
sensitive when it comes to Galleons. 

The problem began when Ludo Bagman disappeared owing the goblins. The 
goblins suspected that he had MoM help to disappear.