Harry's Use of an Unforgivable Curse
Dysis
d.marchel at comcast.net
Thu Apr 15 19:27:05 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 96073
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214"
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:
> Oh, I agree that Harry should not be charged. If anything he
deserves
> praise that even being in such pain and raging at Bella he did not
> have enough hate to cast the right Crucio.
Dysis:
I completely disagree. Just because Harry cannot cast Crucio the
correct way doesn't justify the fact that he did try. In our
society, a criminal can be punished for attempted murder. That
doesn't mean that he killed anyone, but it means that he wanted to.
That in itself is a crime. Harry had enough anger in him to want to
hurt Bellatrix. The justice system doesn't care if it was "righteous
anger" or not. I think JKR is trying to tell us that Harry has a lot
of anger that he can't control, and pretty soon it'll cause him some
problems.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive