Harry's Use of an Unforgivable Curse

Dysis d.marchel at comcast.net
Thu Apr 15 19:27:05 UTC 2004


No: HPFGUIDX 96073

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214" 
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:
> Oh, I agree that Harry should not be charged. If anything he 
deserves 
> praise that even being in such pain and raging at Bella he did not 
> have enough hate to cast the right Crucio.

Dysis:
I completely disagree. Just because Harry cannot cast Crucio the 
correct way doesn't justify the fact that he did try. In our 
society, a criminal can be punished for attempted murder. That 
doesn't mean that he killed anyone, but it means that he wanted to. 
That in itself is a crime. Harry had enough anger in him to want to 
hurt Bellatrix. The justice system doesn't care if it was "righteous 
anger" or not. I think JKR is trying to tell us that Harry has a lot 
of anger that he can't control, and pretty soon it'll cause him some 
problems.






More information about the HPforGrownups archive