Acceptable Abuses?
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Apr 17 23:27:27 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 96244
> Carol adds:
Maybe DD belongs to something like the Rousseau school of
child-rearing--Rousseau thought that cold baths would
accustom a child to enduring hardship. IOW, in DD's view, Harry
*had* to sufferdeprivation (of love and comfort) to be tough
enough to play his part in the battle to come. <
Or maybe he was telling, for once, the simple truth. Privet Drive
was the only place where Harry would be safe. It's the bizarre
nature of Harry's enemy that keeps us from appreciating the
situation Dumbledore was in. One of my own children was born
extremely premature, a life-threatening condition for which the
only treatments were isolating, hazardous, painful and likely to
leave emotional scars.
The fact that I wasn't going to be the one living in pain or dying
peacefully was irrelevant--I still had to make the choice for my
child. All anyone can do in such a situation is choose the way
you hope someone would choose for you. I think that's what
Dumbledore did.
Sirius knew where Harry was going, (at least, he knew where to
find him twelve years later), and he agreed, however reluctantly.
And if he made the decision distraught, and guilt-stricken and
under pressure from authority, well, that's the way it usually is
when your child's life is at stake.
If Harry had to be left with the Dursleys to save him from cancer,
rather than Voldemort, would we be searching for ulterior
motives?
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive