What will theorists think? (was: Re: Lupin, a bad guy?)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Wed Apr 21 21:28:52 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 96617
Like many of us, I found HP and this list at a very troubled time in
my life. All this theorizing is my escape and it's flat out fun.
Meanwhile, I've learned alot about presenting an argument in
what I hope is an entertaining way, and defending a controversial
position without losing my temper or being offensive (I hope.)
ESE!Lupin was going to be a joke. The list was going through
one of its periodic bouts of Snape-bashing, and just to rattle
some chains, I thought it'd be fun to do a non-serious TBAY
proving that the secret traitor to Dumbledore would be
sweetiepie hero Remus. I was reading a book on how to
construct a mystery story at the time, which advised that the clue
to the dirty deed should be planted somewhere in a scene
where the sleuth interviews the villain. I decided to
search the chapter where Harry visits Lupin and Snape brings
the potion, thoroughly not expecting to find anything suspicious
at all. But there was this:
"I made an entire cauldronful," Snape continued. "If you need
more." --PoA ch 8
Well, that could be a clue. It was slightly out of place, for one
thing, like a tilted picture frame. The extra cauldron of potion
never figures in the action. If it was only there as a character note
about how much Snape loves making potions, why wasn't it
closer to his entrance in the scene? Oho, I thought, what's that
extra potion for? And then it struck me.
If there was extra potion, Lupin could have taken it the night of the
Shack. But then Lupin *didn't* lose his human mind when he
transformed. Why, he must have wanted Pettigrew to escape!
*He* was the Death Eater who Peter feared was after him.
Once I started hunting for clues, they seemed to be everywhere. I
began to feel that my little joke might be no joke at all. It was
leading me in a direction that would make a lot of listies
uncomfortable, and I wondered if I'd be spoiling the end if I was
right. But I needn't have worried. Most are still stoutly convinced
of Lupin's innocence, and will remain so, no doubt, right up till
the moment when JKR outs him at last. Fortunately I don't have
to convince anyone that the theory is true...that's *her* job. <veg>
Of course she has tools at her disposal which I lack. One of the
things JKR does as she reveals a mystery is explain one or two
of the clues. This validates them in a way that I cannot, so it's
very hard for any of my solutions to be so convincing.
If I'm right, I'll have bragging rights forever more. If I'm wrong,
I'll still be able to enjoy dissecting the story that JKR did write
and
fleshing out the skeleton of the one she didn't <g> . And I expect
to have a whole lot of company. What e'er betide, there's going
to be a boatload of unhappy Shippers out there <g>
Anyway, ESE!Lupin is so detailed by now that it's bound to be
wrong, even if true in concept. That's the hazard of canon-based
theorizing. JKR isn't bound by our silly rules, and can introduce
new things like metamorphmagery and portraits that move from
house to house at any time. C'est la vie.
I approached my first reading of Phoenix very interested in
finding out what theories would stand up and which would falter,
but I was immediately swept up in the story and forgot all about
them till I was done. I realized, about an inch or so from the end,
that Hagrid wasn't going to die as I thought, but I never
suspected it would be Sirius. I should have been suspicious
when I couldn't figure out a dramatic way for Snape and Sirius to
reconcile and still have Harry be the focus of the story. Snape
and Sirius will never reconcile. Snape and Harry, now...
Pippin
whose very first post asked if anyone thought Snape was a
vampire
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive