A New Prophecy Angle
snow15145
snow15145 at yahoo.com
Sun Aug 1 04:10:43 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 108352
The Prophecy
Lets see a show of hands of how many of us have been totally obsessed
with the prophecy's true meaning, me at the very least. I may not,
may not, have the answer but I do have a different approach to
solving this unnerving puzzle.
How many of us have said maybe the prophecy doesn't actually refer to
Harry but to Neville?
But what if we change the Dark Lord part of the prophecy instead of
the Harry part?
Different idea, the Dark Lord part of the prophecy does not directly
imply that Voldemort is the Dark Lord. Yes, Voldemort is referred to
as "a" Dark Lord. But if the Dark Lord in the prophecy is actually a
different entity (Salazar Slytherin) than Voldemort but also a
manifestation of Voldemort, we are left with the possession theory
again and not a clean cut and dry Voldemort as the one who is
seemingly referred to as the Dark Lord stated in the prophecy. It
isn't just the bodily form of Voldemort that needs to be vanquished
but the Dark Lord (possession) part of Voldemort.
Why does the prophecy refer to the Dark Lord instead of Voldemort?
Answer, because they are not one in the same but at the same time
they appear to be because of perfect wording. It is not the bodily
Voldemort that Harry, Yes! Harry has to vanquish, but the Dark Lord
(possession) part of Voldemort.
JKR is very good at the deceptive train of thought angle. She lays
out a scenario in which we do not question it until we become so
obsessed that we comb it with a fine-tooth comb to find the
significant assumption (to assume-makes an ass out of u and me) that
we, as readers, readily excepted the first read through, and with
this topic many thorough readings, but still no substantial answers
to suffice in this particular case. If this were not a true statement
why would so many of us be attempting to replace Harry with Neville
in the prophecy? Answer, because we have been led to think in this
manner. Either Neville or Harry could have been the one but in the
end no matter who the "one" is doesn't appear to give us a
satisfactory answer. We still feel very uneasy about substituting
either Harry or Neville because it still remains the same puzzlement.
Why would that be? Answer, because that isn't, as it turns out, the
most significant part of the prophecy puzzle. This is why neither
Harry nor Neville makes a difference to our satisfied answer. The
real answer that will satisfy us is in the end is, who is the Dark
Lord? Then, and only then will the puzzle of the prophecy make
absolute sense.
Snow-who is obsessed with finding the end to a book that feels like
the last pages have been ripped out.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive