Ron's Patronus (Warning Ron=DD)

[txjen70]

No: HPFGUIDX 109873

I've read the Dumbledore is Ron theory and while I do see how it 
could be possible, I personally don't think that will happen.  
However, you make a good point if that particular theory is true 
because hiding it from us probably means she is hiding it from Harry 
also.  He probably didn't see it.  Now if Harry saw Dumbledore's 
patronus (I can't remember if he did) then of course noting that 
Ron's was the same might be more of a clue than she wants to give.  
So she could be hiding it until she is ready for Harry to notice 
Ron's patronus and that it is the same as Dumbledore's.


--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "vmonte" <vmonte at y...> wrote:
> Shannon wrote:
> 
> I was rereading OoP recently, and noticed something that struck me 
as 
> a little bit odd.  During the last DA meeting, (US Edition, pages 
606-
> 607), they are working on producing Patronuses.  They mention 
Cho's 
> swan, Hermione's otter, and she even mentions Lavender, Neville 
and 
> Seamus.  But no Ron, whether he was having trouble or had done it 
> successfully, nothing.  It seemed odd to me because usually when 
JKR 
> gets into describing how students are handling difficult bits of  
> magic, she at leasts describes Harry, Ron and Hermione's efforts.
> Anyone have any thoughts as to why he might have been left 
entirely 
> out of this scene? Am I making something out of nothing?
> 
> 
> vmonte responds:
> 
> You are not making something out of nothing.  There is a reason 
why 
> JKR left this bit out.  JKR once said that she could not tell a 
fan 
> what Snape's patronus was because it would give too much away. I 
bet 
> Ron's patronus would also...
> My theory (and it's not popular) is that Ron is Dumbledore and 
that 
> they both have the same patronus.  
> 
> vivian