Why didn't the Longbottoms go into hiding?
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at aol.com
Fri Aug 20 06:44:26 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 110696
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "baphythegoat"
<baphythegoat at y...> wrote:
> It is also intersting to note that while Neville and Harry are in
the
> same year, that this does not necissarily mean that they were born
> weeks apart... Could Neville be a bit younger?(even up to a year?)
> After all, much has been made of his addled memory. Could it be
> possible that the curse on the Longbottoms affected their child...
> directly, becuase he was technically in utero?
>
> Hmmmm?
>
> I always had the notion that Neville was given by Dumbledore as an
> example of another boy who could have been in Harry's shoes, not
> necessarily that it would have to had been him OR Harry...
>
> Baphy the goat
Geoff:
You seem to have overlooked the very specific information given to
Harry by Dumbledore:
'"It means - me?"
Dumbledore surveyed him for a moment through his glasses,
"The odd thing, Harry," he said softly, "is that it may not have
meant you at all. Sybill's prophecy could have applied to two wizard
boys, both born at the end of July that year, both of whom had
parents in the Order of the Phoenix, both sets of parents having
narrowly escaped Voldemort three times. One, of course, was you. The
other was Neville Longbottom."
(OOTP "The Lost Prophecy" p.742 UK edition)
I think that is sufficiently detailed to rule your suggestions out of
consideration - both born at roughly the same time and only two names
in the frame.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive