Snape and the Edinburgh Festival
nkafkafi
nkafkafi at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 24 13:55:09 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 111095
Alla wrote:
Hey, Neri. I am actually equally torn between these two theories. I
want Snape's redemption "done right" and even though I don't
consider him to be a good guy yet, I prefer to think that he is
capable of making moral choices.... sometimes. ;o)
I think him trying to pay his life debt to James is very likely, but
then if he left Voldie for that reason only it would mean that Snape
still shares DE ideology in many many important matters. Does he
miss his DE days?
Neri:
Well, I think this is a bit more in character than the Big Bang
scenario. I mean, if he had a shattering moral epiphany then why is
he so nasty now? But I think you have the same problem I have with
the Life Debt scenario: it lacks punch. We already know about this
part.
Alla wrote:
I think I like dramatic event the best. Something really horrific
and unexpected (unexpected murder ???) made him see that Voldemort
and Co are not the best company to hang out with?
And of course the person killed should be somebody Snape cared
about, otherwise it just would not work, IMO.
Neri:
Well, if he cared for the person who was killed then it is actually
the Revenge scenario, isn't it? If he didn't care about him
personally then it is the moral revelation scenario. This is how I
see it. The difference between plain revenge and true morality is
that true morality is universal, not personal.
Not that I have much against the Revenge scenario. It is certainly in
character. It is just that it's so conventional. Half the action
movies from Hollywood use it (and not necessarily the better half
either). OTOH Shakespeare had some very good stuff based on the
revenge motive. But Shakespeare was a true FEATHERBOA whereas JKR is
not. I'm not sure she can do justice to the Revenge scenario.
As you can see I'm still of five-and-a-half minds in this.
Neri
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive