harry is tom riddle
mz_annethrope
mz_annethrope at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 26 06:57:06 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 111257
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "snow15145" <snow15145 at y...>
wrote:
> Jim Ferer, who believes that LV is not naturally "alive" anyway,
his
> existence sustained only by magic.
>
> Snow;
> You're right LV isn't alive and what is left of him would not be
> alive if it weren't for Harry! Of course this is only my opinion.
> Voldemort died that night at Godric's Hollow but left a piece of
> himself or should I say a piece of Tom Riddle in Harry which keeps
> him semi-alive
this much I will support until I am proven wrong
by
> JKR.
> JKR asked why didn't Voldemort die that night, the question should
> have been, did he live? >
<snip>
[{(Harry is what keeps Voldemort alive and therefore Harry is what
> can defeat him
forever!)}]
>
mz_annethrope:
How can anything be semi-alive? Hmmm. A virus. At least that's a
nice Muggle World analogy. Voldemort has been remarkably parasitic
ever since his great defeat: inhabiting animals and Quirrel,
swilling unicorn blood and snake venom, regenerating in bits and
pieces of servant, father and enemy. You may have a point.
mz_annethrope
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive