Slytherin House again. Was: Re: Problem with OotP? (was: Pampering)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Thu Dec 2 04:54:24 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 119043
> > Carol responds:
> > Neither am I. and the Sorting Hat, which seems to have a
conscience,probably wouldn't put children in Slytherin if it
thought that placement would make them evil.
>
> Alla:
>
> The question is why then? We are trying to find compelling
reason for the existence of Slytherin House and honestly, I don't
see one right now. It is a given that majority of Slytherin students
becomes DE. Not only Slytherins become DE, but Slytherins do.
Pippin:
Whoa! There are somewhere between 70 and 250 Slytherins
enroled at Hogwarts, and we know of less than ten who became
DE's. That's hardly a majority.
If, as JKR has said, children are basically good unless they are
very damaged, then there is nothing inherently evil about the
Slytherin children. Their moral development suffers because the
notion that magical races are inherently noble discourages
them from thinking they need moral guidance, especially from
'lesser' types.
The Slytherins are there, IMO, so JKR can demonstrate why, if
children are basically good, they *need* moral guidance --
because those damaged individuals like Voldemort will
otherwise lead them astray. On the WW level, they are there
because the Slytherin parents wouldn't have it any other way.
Alla:
> There should be a reason why the House with racist ideology
exists for 1000 years.<
Pippin:
Binns says that Slytherin thought magical learning should be
kept in all magical families. He didn't say all *wizard*
families...it could be that Slytherin was actually more open to
half-breeds, provided their ancestors on both sides were
magical, than the other founders were. Harry thinks some
Slytherins look like they are part troll, and there is a joke about
Goyle being a troll in FBAWTFT.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive