Angry Harry in HBP?
lupinlore
bob.oliver at cox.net
Tue Dec 14 02:59:19 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 119852
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214"
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:
>
<Snip>
> Alla:
>
> Could you please clarify? Which reasons that got Harry upset did
you
> consider to be not logical or understandable? Because I found all
of
> them to be logical and understandable.
>
>
I'm not Javalorum, obviously, but I'll take a stab at it. I think
what Java is trying to say is that it isn't that Harry being angry at
events is unbelievable, it's that the events *themselves* are
unbelievable. That is it stretches credulity to think that
Dumbledore would be *that* stupid, that McGonagall would be *that*
ham-handed and unsympathetic, etc. The whole thing smells of plot
device. In order to have Harry become progressively angrier to the
point of breakdown, JKR had to have the characters around Harry
behave in incredibly stupid ways that are not in keeping with how
they've been portrayed in previous books.
I think this relates to what a lot of people said when they first
read OOTP, i.e. that it seemed more like fanfiction than canon. Many
of the characters around Harry seem off kilter and slightly bizarre,
apparently because JKR wanted Harry to reach breakdown point and had
to do wierd things with the characters in order to achieve that.
My take, anyway.
Lupinlore
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive