Theoretical boundaries

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 120383


> Del replies:
Agreed only if you also admit that it is no problem either if someone
desires to go at it in a totally different way. You are entitled to
your emotional approach, but you cannot *impose* it on anyone who
declares not to be interested in it.

Alla:

Absolutely agreed, but what do you mean by "imposing" if we debate 
the same topic? 


> Del replies:
This is a *discussion* forum about *imaginary* characters, which 
means that I, for example, feel free to step out of
my RL morality to go and examine things from a different angle as
often as I wish. I have found that it helps me define more precisely
my own morality, it helps me understand why I adhere to it, what is
important to me and why.


Alla:

Absolutely, I can also step out of my RL morality and can understand 
when other people do it, I am only saying that I don't like  being 
told that evaluating characters from the position of my RL morality 
is invalid.