Theoretical boundaries

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 120525




Carol:

snip.

I have nothing against emotional interpretations calmly and civilly
presented--except that they can never persuade those who don't share
those emotions. And I also object to expressions like "don't ever
think that" which attempt to impose one person's views on others.
(And, no, Alla, I'm not talking about you here.)



Alla:

Yes, yes, thank you, I also think civility is the key. Personally I 
believe that the ONLY type of argument which does not belong on the 
list is flame type. Any other type of argument (related to canon, of 
course and which does not belong on other groups) should be fair 
game , otherwise it is just imposing  on the right to free 
debate. :o), in my opinion of course.

And I believe that emotions WITH facts can be very persuasive, but 
that is just my opinion and to each their own.



Happy holidays.