JKR's Messages (was Re: Hermione In Trouble?)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Wed Dec 29 22:53:57 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 120724
> SSSusan:
> I can see your point somewhat, Pippin, especially about
Marietta. I think Hermione did go too far with that, and I think
JKR *is* showing us that Hermione's intentions aren't enough
with SPEW, either, as I mentioned in #120669. I'm not sure I'd
put Hermione's actions re: DJU and the centaurs into this
category, though. In cases like that, if Hermione gets a
comeuppance, fine.
>
> What I'm saying is I hope I didn't imply that I believe there is a
blanket "Everything they do is okay" hanging over the Trio, but
rather that since JKR does call them "innately good" and does
talk about fighting for what's right even if the battle will never
be
won, that she does make a distinction that "bad" or "wrong"
behavior can definitely be good and right behavior if one's
intentions are to fight evil/wrong.
>
> Maybe I misinterpreted what JKR meant by "the battle that will
never be won" though -- I assumed she meant the battle against
evil and hypocrisy and ignorance and prejudice, those things
which will unfortunately always be with us. But maybe you've got
a different take on it and can shed a different light on her
remarks there.<
Pippin:
I think what she means by innate goodness is that the Trio's
sense of right and wrong is maturing on schedule and hasn't
been damaged. They are revolted by cruelty, as Draco and
Snape are not, and their ability to form attachments to others and
their desire to see fair play are intact and broadening.That
makes them very different from Tom Riddle. I think what JKR is
saying is that the battle against the Riddles and their followers
can never be won completely, because the only way to keep
them from exploiting the rights and freedoms the rest of us enjoy
is to deny them to everybody, and if we do that, they've won.
SSSusan:
> But anyway, I guess my specific question in response to your
post here is: Would JKR really be telling us via the
Hermione-turns-into- a-cat episode that she's being *punished*
or getting her comeuppance for stealing? I mean, she may be
the one who stole the ingredients, but the other two were equally
involved in the process -- accessories, as it were -- and so if
what she/they were doing was morally wrong & worthy of
punishment/comeuppance, wouldn't JKR have had all *three*
experience such consequence? <
>
Pippin:
Harry *did* get a punishment. He's quite sure Snape
embarrassed him in front of the duelling club for throwing the
firework. Ron didn't take part in the theft, IIRC, so it makes sense
that nothing much happened to him.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive