Marietta and Hermione (was JKR's Messages ) (was Re: Hermione In Trouble?)

hickengruendler hickengruendler at yahoo.de
Thu Dec 30 22:42:16 UTC 2004


No: HPFGUIDX 120789


--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "pippin_999" <foxmoth at q...> 
wrote:
> 
> Pippin:
> 
> > > I think Hermione was wrong to use the 
> > > centaurs' xenophobia as a weapon. 
> 
> Eggplant:
> 
> > So let me get this straight, if you had been in Hermione's 
> shoes you would have done the "moral" thing and Umbridge 
>  would have won and Harry would have suffered a horrible death. 
> Hermione did the "immoral" thing and as a result Umbridge 
>  lost and Harry lived.<
> 
> Pippin:
> Um, the centaurs were going to drag Harry and Hermione off and 
> do whatever they did to Umbridge. If her plan had worked as she 
> intended, Hermione's "morality" would have resulted in three 
> people being driven insane instead of just one. IMO, it was 
> immoral as well as stupid for Hermione to try to unleash a 
> weapon she couldn't control.  It would have been far more 
> sensible as well as ethical  to lead Umbridge to Grawp in the 
> first place. At least he was her friend.
> 
> Pippin

Hickengruendler:

This might be true, but Hermione didn't have much time to think of a 
plan. She had to save Harry, and she had to do it quickly. If she had 
waited a bit longer to make a better plan, than Harry could have 
joined Neville's parents in St. Mungo's. Besides, the centaurs told 
her, that they don't hurt foals, therefore Hermione had a reason to 
believe that she and Harry make it out of the forest unharmed. In the 
end she made a mistake in telling the centaurs that she used them. 
Therefore basically it was her honesty/big mouth that brought them 
into trouble, not the deed itself. And while telling the centaurs the 
truth probably was very foolish, it wasn't immoral.







More information about the HPforGrownups archive