Were Dumbledore & Snape involved in James & Lilly's death+ LV downfall?
Fred Waldrop
fredwaldrop at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 2 19:48:52 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 90098
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "naamagatus" <naama_gat at h...>
wrote:
Irina:
He did have time thereafter to have James and Lily betrayed to their
deaths, knowing that Lily would sacrifice herself in a way that
would keep Harry alive but leave him marked. I doubt the "Mission
Impossible" team could have brought it off.
Irina
=====================================================================
Naama:
I completely agree with Jim that there was no way DD could have
known that Lily would sacrifice herself in the way she did. Nor
could he have been sure of the effects of such an act. LV was Avada
Kedavering people left and right, overcoming powerful wizards and
witches. The prophecy doesn't preclude the possiblity that LV will
overcome his rival. So, it doesn't even make sense that DD would
encourage a duel between LV and baby Harry, even he was as
manipulating and cold hearted as you paint him.
Naama
=====================================================================
Hello all, Fred Waldrop here;
I have been thinking about the prophecy a lot for a while now.
(page 741 UK & 841 US OotP)
"THE ONE WITH THE POWER TO VANQUISH THE DARK LORD APPROCHES....BORN
TO THOSE WHO HAVE THRICE DEFIED HIM, BORN AS THE SEVENTH MONTH
DIES... AND THE DARK LORD WILL MARK HIM AS HIS EQUAL, BUT HE WILL
HAVE POWERS THE DARK LORD WILL KNOW NOT... AND EITHER MUST DIE AT
THE HANDS OF THE OTHER FOR NEITHER CAN LIVE WHILE THE OTHER
SURVIVES... THE ONE WITH POWER TO VANQUISH THE DARK LORD WILL BE
BORN AS THE SEVENTH MONTH DIES..."
Now I know it is only my opinion, but the two parts that jump out at
me are "THE ONE WITH THE POWER TO VANQUISH THE DARK LORD APPROCHES"
and "AND EITHER MUST DIE AT THE HANDS OF THE OTHER".
Now my point is this, LV COULD NOT kill Harry, because at THAT TIME,
Harry was not able(old enough, powerful enough?) to kill LV.
And until Harry DOES have the power/will/ability to kill LV, LV
will not be able to kill Harry.
Because in the prophecy, "THE ONE WITH THE POWER TO VANQUISH THE
DARK LORD" has to be able to kill LV, because the prophcey says
"EITHER MUST DIE AT THE HANDS OF THE OTHER". It give BOTH Harry AND
LV a chance, not just one or the other.
Also, I think the reason in GoF, chap. 36, "The Parting of the
Ways", Harry says, "For a fleeting instant, Harry thought he saw a
gleam of something like triumph in Dumbledore's eyes."
I think that Dumbledore knows that it is not really Lily's sacrafice
that saved Harry (I think it could have made it a lot eaiser for
Harry, IE he just gets a scar instead of something worse. Without
Lily's sacrafice, Harry could have been hurt much worse but still
have lived.)
And because LV thinks he has some extra sort of charm protecting him
now, and Dumbledore knows he doesn't, this is what I think
the "gleam of triumph" in Dumbledores eye was about.
But, we will know in a few years, hopefully.
Fred
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive