Fidelius Charm
KathyK
zanelupin at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 13 05:36:45 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 90837
Carol wrote:
> I'm almost certain that Dumbledore testified in a hearing (there
was no trial) that Sirius had been the Potter's Secret Keeper. He
believed that Sirius was guilty, not only at that time but through
most of PoA.
> Sorry I don't have the page reference at hand.<
KathyK can help with that:
It's PoA, Ch 21, "Hermione's Secret" US pg 392:
"I myself gave evidence to the Ministry that Sirius had been the
Potters' Secret-Keeper."
Dumbledore testified, but not necessarily at a hearing.
Carol:
>I also wonder why they didn't use Priori Incantatem< <snip>
KathyK:
Maybe they did. But with the damning evidence of a street full of
witnesses and Dumbledore's confirmation that Sirius was Secret-
Keeper, I imagine it would have been very easy to ignore a little
thing like what Prior Incantato would have revealed. Or it's quite
possible they never bothered with the spell because Sirius appeared
so guilty. Besides, it's not like he had a trial or anything. When
and where did Dumbledore give this evidence? We don't know. He
could have just told the Minister or Crouch what he knew in a
conversation or it could have been some sort of hearing. Either
way, Crouch didn't give Sirius a chance to defend himself, and the
only people who could have helped him died because of him. I'll bet
Sirius didn't even try to explain what happened, he was so guilty
for what he'd done.
KathyK, obsessed with the whole Fidelius business
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive