Determining innocence, was Re: Fidelius Charm

Regina rmm7e at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 13 21:34:33 UTC 2004


No: HPFGUIDX 90893

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "justcarol67" 
<justcarol67 at y...> wrote:

> Given all the magical methods of accessing a person's
> memory magically, from legilmency to Pensieves, there's really no
> excuse for sending an innocent witch or wizard to prison.

I was thinking about this just this morning (I have a long commute, 
heh heh). Why do innocent wizards get sent to prison? Why aren't 
those magical methods of determining innocence used?

It must be seen as unethical, just as we muggles wouldn't be 
sticking every alleged criminal with sodium whatever-it-is. We don't 
use evidence against a person if it's obtained illegally, either, 
even if it means the person will get away with a crime.

Anyone have a discourse about this to share?

--Regina





More information about the HPforGrownups archive