Justice distorted (was: Re: the mirror of erised fulfilled?)
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at aol.com
Mon Feb 23 23:27:12 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 91504
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Partha Mukhopadhyay
<ahtrap at y...> wrote:
Partha:
<snipped>
> Secondly, shouldn't priori incantatem (spelling?) have
> shown that Sirius Black had not indeed blown apart the
> street full of Muggles....and Peter Pettigrew? Figured
> that might be a case of the PI spell being a recent
> invention, if you can think of spells as technologies.
>
Geoff:
I believe that the innocence of Sirius Black was never even taken on
board at the time of the event.
In the UK, we have had a number of cases in the last few years where
there have been miscarriages of justice; the wrong people have been
jailed because the police misinterpreted evidence, ignored evidence
and sometimes invented evidence.
Why? Because there was a public outcry demanding that the police do
their job and find the offender(s). The police want to show that they
are in control and doing something so they rush the case to try to
produce a result and the bodged results have only come to light years
later, often after deterined efforts by friends and relatives.
This is obviously echoed in the Wizarding World where we are told
that some folk were packed off to Azkaban without a proper trial.
Sirius was among these; there was enough circumstancial evidence to
incriminate him - compounded by Peter's words and actions. Fudge in
particular has shown himself to be willing to manipulate the truth to
present himself and the Ministry in a good light which helps to
consolidate his power base and conversely unwilling to initiate any
steps to confirm evidence put forward with which he does not agree.
Look at his behaviour at the end of GOF as an example. He seems to be
prepared to deliberately ignore methods of checking on facts if they
are going to undermine the stance he takes.
Umbridge is allowed to act as the official mouthpiece of Fudge at
Hogwarts and in so doing hide the looming danger posed by the return
of Voldemort. The Daily Prophet adds to this by its scurrilous
campaign against Dumbledore and Harry. No consideration is given that
they might be right. Here, we are seeing the kind of repression,
distorion of the truth and suppression of a real justice system which
has so often occurred uinder a totalitarian state in the past.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive