Blood Lollipops (wasWhy ole Snapey is a vamp was Re: No fire in the office)
quigonginger
quigonginger at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 6 13:37:16 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 88145
Not so long ago, Kneasy speculated that the blood flavoured lollipops
in Hogsmead may have also been a treat for hags, given their
propensity to eat children and raw liver. Unfortunately, that was
snipped, and I am forced to paraphrase. (Asking Kneasy's indulgence)
Pippin replied:
> Pippin: (on blood flavoured lollipops)
> > Well, I've got to go with Hermione here. She said they were for
> > vampires, and on matters of fact she has never yet been wrong.
> >
To which Kneasy countered:
> Kneasy:
> A fact or an assumption? Usually when Hermione states a fact she
> quotes her source, when she makes an assumption or supposition
> she gets it wrong as often as anyone else (nature of Lockhart,
> Kreachur, Hogwart Elves wish to be free, bewitched broom, etc)
Now Ginger joins in:
I like the hag theory, although I would think that vampires would be
the primary target group. I must point out that Hermione
said "...They're for vampires, I expect." (PoA US paperback p. 197)
suggesting uncertainty. So they may even be a novelty item
classified under "unusual tastes". I once got a tequila lolly
complete with the worm, but I never ate it. Certainly an unusual
taste.
It's too bad Hermione didn't look up the ingredients. Had they
actually been made of real blood, we may have our answer. OTOH, had
they been made with artificial flavours, we'd be back to wondering if
vampires in the JKR world eat human food, artificial though it may be.
What I am now wondering is if British slang for lollypop is sucker,
as it is here in the US. If that is the case, maybe JKR figured that
we'd heard enough about vampires that we'd expect to see a
bloodsucker and enjoyed a play on words.
Ginger, who doesn't think that Snape is a vampire, but has full
confidence that JKR could pull it off should she so choose.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive