Why ole Snapey is(n't) a vamp (or old, either!)
doliesl
doliesl at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 8 09:12:09 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 88234
> > Marianne:
> > I sure hope we get this info. I'm not entirely convinced that
Snape
> > is good, just that he's chosen not to throw his lot in with Vmort
and
> > his merry band of DEs. I'm betting that we will find out that
Snape
> > turned to the "good" side simply because he was smart enough to
hedge
> > his bets. As Phineas Nigellus says, "We (Slytherins) will always
> > choose to save our own necks."
(sorry to snip)
D:
One major problem with this view: I do not believe such selfish, self-
preserved menality could won Dumbledore's trust at all. Dumbledore is
a trusting man but not a fool. Unless Snape indeed possessed
abilities (other than occlumency) and some great plans that are far
too valuable that somehow justified enough his place in the eyes of
Dumbledore and other order members. No order member (other than
Sirius, well he doesn't count since he hasn't been around all these
years) has raise suspicion about Snape at all. A former DE's reason
of turning "good" even convince the likes of Molly Weasley, who did
not seem to object nor make a fuss about his credibility at all. You
keep mention how your view fit with Snape's style this and that, it
certainly does NOT fit with the painful image of Snape rubbing
(unconsciously) his dark mark, and his seemingly fearful insistence
in not calling out Voldemort's name. Because what you are saying
tends to generalize and simplifie ALL of Snape's character and all
his past actions. The self-preservation reason really is nothing so
sacred nor special that is only between Dumbledore and Snape. To me
it is predictable and BORING, sorry to say that. It's like, after all
the mysteries over why Dumbledore trusts him turns out he is just
another token Slytherins stereotype who is ever so predictable. It
literarally spell out for you already. Such "secret" do not need all
that high-secrecy and 2 more volumes to reveal. JKR can do better
than that. She keeps telling us to keep an eye on Snape; there're
more story to tell about Snape.
In my reading he is not a flawless master-scheme commander type who
is capable of playing Dumbledore all along, nor would betray
Dumbledore. Maybe JKR was speaking through Dumbledore (she said if
there is something she wants to tell readers as the truth it would be
through either Hermione or Dumbledore) when he said
unapologetically "I trust Severus Snape." However there are couple
obvious Snapish qualities to keep in mind as possibilities of why he
turn "good": vengeful, a thirst to prove being "right", a thirst to
be "recognize", hard working to achieve, insecurity, jealousy,
emotional (especially that "wearing emotion" speech that could be
about himself afterall)...etc. there are just so much more
possibilities than being solely self-interest and self-preserve.
D.
agree with all who're against the vampire theory and not crazy about
the Perseus Evans anagram thingy...been there done that guys
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive