Why ole Snapey is a vamp was Re: No fire in the office

[jakedjensen]

No: HPFGUIDX 88286

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "arrowsmithbt" 
<arrowsmithbt at b...> wrote:

> Kneasy:

> You are obviously strongly attached to the Snape!Vampire theory.
> I assume you must have some evidence for taking this stance.
> Fine; let's hear it. But I won't be responding unless it comes from 
> canon and is objectively compelling.

Kneasy, I know you didn't say this to me....but I can't help but 
notice that a great deal of canon evidence has been presented by 
others.  Initially, I would point you to Pippin's post (#35299 I 
believe) which will lead you to countless other canon-based posts.    
Secondly, one might want to be careful when using a phrase 
like "objectively compelling."  What does such a phrase mean?  
Objectively compelling to you?  Well...you are "strongly attached" to 
the idea that Snape is not a vampire and believe that, if he is, it 
would be a big letdown for the series.

Jake
Who thinks that Snape being a vampire is logical and that him not 
being a vampire is logical