Vamp 'til ready

[koinonia02]

No: HPFGUIDX 88495

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "arrowsmithbt" 
<arrowsmithbt at b...> wrote:

> Why a vampire now? Indeed, why a vampire at all - anywhere in the 
> cast list?

"K"
That's a good question. Why wait so long to show us a vampire? But 
then again, why wait so long to tell us about Lily. It's a matter of 
keeping what's important till the end.

Kneazy: 
> But for those that feel deprived if a fantasy adventure omits such 
>beings then I'd recommend looking at all the runners in the field 
>and comparing their form before fixing the odds.


"K"
Even though I do love vampires and would like to see them in the 
story, I would just like to say I wouldn't use the word 'deprived' as 
the way I would feel if no vamps show up. 
 

Kneazy:
> Voldy seems to show more of the commonly  accepted characteristics 
> of vampirism than Snape does.
(snip) 
> So why do many insist on Snape!Vampire when Voldy!Vampire is a 
> better bet? 

Who says there has to be only one? 

Kneazy:
>Could it be that there are people out there that *gasp* do
> not appreciate our Sevvy? 

"K"
What?!? How could you say that. Oh, I do appreciate Snape. Probably 
more than most people. He is the best character in the book. Followed 
by Dumbledore, of course. :-)