Time travel is dangerous (part 2)
Caius Marcius
coriolan_cmc at hotmail.com
Sat Jan 17 14:28:32 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 89003
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "vmonte" <vmonte at y...> wrote:
> Neri wrote:
> As my test case I use the Ron=DD theory, which is discussed as part
> of the knight2king theory (read all about it in
> http://www.knight2king.net , hoping I got the link right this
time).
> JKR can save herself from paradox by devising just two histories.
> This may be termed the Double Loop Ploy (DLP): Ron travels 130
years
> into the past,
Given all the clocks in the DoM, time and time-travel appear to be
one of the phenomenon still under intensive investigation. As far as
we have been shown so far, the distance that one can travel in time
is limited. The Time-Turner - which requires one turn for every
retrograde hour - would be a highly impractical means of traveling
back more than a few days (just imagine Hermione trying to use her
Turner to visit 1863!)
Whether there are more powerful versions of the Time-Turner that
would allow its operator to travel back through years and centuries
remains to be seen. However, the fact that so much of early Wizard
history is but dimly remembered semi-legend - e.g., the founding of
Hogwarts, and the glaring lacuna in the biographies of Gryffindor,
Ravenclaw, Hufflepuff and Slytherin - would suggest that either
wizardly historical researchers are uninterested in time-travel as a
way of studying history, or that the magical technology to travel back
further in time has yet to be invented.
Still, the fact that time-travel has been used once in the HP
narrative makes it likely that it will play a role in one of the
future volumes.
- CMC
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive