[HPforGrownups] Re: Titling convention significant?

[EnsTren at aol.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 89688

In a message dated 1/26/2004 2:44:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Amy Z" <lupinesque at yahoo.com> writes:

>David wrote:
>
>> Perhaps Book 7 is 
>> to be entitled 'Harry Potter and X Y' where X Y is the name of a 
>> person 
>
>Or the description of a person whose identity we learn as we read, as 
>with Prisoner of Azkaban. I know: Harry Potter and the Nemesis of 
>Voldemort! Tee hee.
>

I like that Title, but it should be puralized.  The Nemesises of Voldemort, because though the books are about Harry they are also about the entire light side of the conflict.

>BTW, Hitomi, your argument is very sound and almost definitely 
>correct. I'm just working out a kink that's been bugging me for a 
>while. I also like making the occasional long-shot prediction 
>because they pay off so much more generously.
>

How about this as a Long-shot: one of the next books are going to feature, perhaps heavil the Quinipeds, (I don't have the monster book next to me).  Why do I think so?  Because they were mentioned in the Monster book, mentioned they are only found one place in the world, and given back history, when there was no reason to mentioned them at all.


Nemi