FAQs: Lily died before James?
M.Clifford
Aisbelmon at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 1 03:07:32 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 103813
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Jenni A.M. Merrifield"
<strawberry at j...> wrote:
> Gorda wrote:
> [...snip...]
>
> > Here's the test-only link:
> >
> > http://www.jkrowling.com/textonly/faq_view.cfm?id=19
>
> Jenni replies:
>
> Uhmmm... I just clicked on that link you gave and the text very
> definitely starts:
>
> "Lily first, then James. ..."
>
> I even checked the flash version and it says the same thing.
>
> Soooo... it looks like all the recent hypothesizing has been for
> naught. (But it was still fun, wasn't it? ;-)
>
> Jenni A. M. Merrifield
> -=> strawberryJAMM <=-
Believe it or not Jenni. Only two days ago the page most certainly
said James first, then Lily.........
It was read reread and cut and pasted by the shocked fandom that saw
it. The very next day it changed to what you see now.
I agree that what appears now (ie Lily then James) must be the
correct and accurate version of events.
Surely Jo must have been listening in when we all began hopping
merrily along with our Lily died first theories, is all I can say,
because she corrected us swiftly on that.
Order seems to have some great deal of relevance to the book themes.
JKR alludes often to things being in reverse order in the WW. I
wonder if the "Order of the Phoenix" name has some relevance. We
know a phoenix has a kind of reverse order in its life in that its
end is its beginning.
Valky
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive