Harry uses Hermione's wand to kill Volemort?

[cubfanbudwoman]

No: HPFGUIDX 104437

anasazi wrote:
> I'm a H/Hr, and I can unbiasedly tell you that there are hints in 
> the movie to keep both shippers happy. And about the H/Hr clues 
> you were speaking about, I think you should add one that may be 
> the most important one (not necesarily in the shippy sense, but as 
> a foreshadow of what may happen in Book Six/Seven)... and is the 
> powerful spell that Harry achieves when he uses Hermione's wand.


SSSusan:
You're speaking of how Harry grabs Hermione's wand in the Shrieking 
Shack and hits Snape w/ an Expelliarmus which knocks him out?  I 
thought that was weird, given that in the book it's the fact that 
THREE people [I think?] simultaneously hit him with Expelliarmus 
which caused him to be thrown back and knocked unconscious. I 
thought that was an unusual change to have made.

anasazi:
> Since we have been purposely kept in the dark by JKR as to the 
> core of Hermione's wand (seeing as Hermione is one of her favorite 
> characters, I don't think JKR will neglect a little detail like 
> that unless it will prove to be a very important detail for the 
> remaining books.
> 
> So, let's do a bit of hypothesizing... since Harry can't kill 
> Voldemort with his own wand (the twin effect), what if he uses 
> Hermione's wand to do it? What if Hermione's wand is made of a 
> core more powerful than the phoenix or the unicorn? Or if she 
> infuses it with a spell not unlike Lily's original protection?
> 

SSSusan:
Interesting idea.  For now I'm sticking with the canon version of 
what knocked Snape back, but if you're right that this was one of 
the Cuaron changes which gave JKR chills, then, well, who knows??? :-
)

Siriusly Snapey Susan