Wands - again

[fienxjox]

No: HPFGUIDX 105265

Del wrote:
> Well, maybe it's the same with wizards and wands. Some wizards are 
> so good that they can manage almost anything with any wand. Others 
> can perform any usual magic with any wand, but wouldn't try special 
> spells with a wand that's not theirs. And still others (like 
> Neville maybe) can't do anything good with any other wand but 
> theirs, unless they really practice hard.


Fx now:

An excelent analogy Del, and I would suggest the possibility of 
another that JKR gave us.  In PS/SS we are introduced to Wizard's 
Chess and are told that it is eaiser with an older set that you have 
used for a long time, not only because you are used to it (and 
possibly have more experience) but also because it is used to YOU (I 
think it was Seamus' set H was using in the begining and loosing 
with).  This might also work with wands in that they "choose the 
wizard."  They might (WW now ;) have some sense of how skilled a 
wizard you are and act accordingly.

Just an thought (just maybe worth .02 ____(insert monatary type))

Fx