Distinct Novel vs Separate Parts & Tolkein (was: flaws in the books)
sevenhundredandthirteen
sevenhundredandthirteen at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 13 02:07:59 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 105897
Katie wrote:
>Your post was fascinating; I just wanted to make one minor
>correction. Frodo is not dead to the reader at the end of The Two
>Towers; he is quite alive, but captured in the Tower. (You can make
>a comparable point with Gandalf, though!)
I (Laurasia) reply:
Maybe I should have said he `appears dead' or at the very
least, as if he was in real danger of dying. As soon as Sam took
the ring, it became a real possibility that Frodo was now a
redundant ring bearer. Because the story of the ring was told
by a series of bearers of the ring rather than one single
protagonist as soon as the ring is passed between Frodo and Sam,
there is the possibility that the hobbit we've been following all
this time is just one leg of the journey- like Bilbo. My point
was that Harry Potter isn't told by legs of journeys from
different points of view.
Trevor wrote:
>I would also point out that Harry Potter is written as 7 distinct
novels in
>one series where as LOTR was written as one book- the editors broke
it into
>3 parts for marketing concerns. The HP series therefore consists of
much
>more distinct novels rather than one continuous book.
I reply:
I think that whether series or one novel makes little difference in
this instance. Take the series about a group of people where each
book is told by a different member (Lots of kids books do this,-
when I was 8 I was a big fan of `The Babysitter's Club`).
Each book is definitely a separate entity, but because there
is a revolving series of protagonists, there is never any
guarantee that one won't move away, another one might join in
their place (Like the TV series `Charmed' where it was very
easy to replace sisters, because each episode didn't focus on
a single main protagonist). This is because there is a series
of protagonists who have equal footing.
Even though Harry Potter is definitely seven distinct novels
there's never been a chapter where Ron went off to do something
for the plot without Harry. Harry is a lone protagonist and
no-one is his equal so it would be hard, or unsatisfying at the
very best, for JKR to switch mid-series. I think this aspect of
the story dictates that Harry can't die midway through, rather
than the separation of each part of the story into distinct
books.
~<(Laurasia)>~
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive