Ginny the villain WAS Re: Dobby redux

[aggiepaddy]

No: HPFGUIDX 106464

> > Kneasy:
> > Headlines in the Daily Prophet: 
> > "Daughter of Ministry Employee Dies Using Dark Magic Artifact That
> > Unleashes Monster On Fellow Students."
> > 
> > Arthurs credibility would be shot - and he's a major DD supporter
> > in the Ministry.

 
  
>  Halli:
>      "A clever plan," said Dumbledore. "Because if Harry here and 
> his friend Ron hadn't discovered this book, why - Ginny Weasley 
> might have taken all the blame. No one would ever have been able to 
> prove she hadn't acted of her own free will...."   "And 
> imagine," ... "Imagine the effect on Arthur Weasley and his Muggle-
> Protection Act, if his own daughter was discovered attacking and 
> killing muggle-borns..."


Aggie:

Yes, yes, yes,  I UNDERSTAND that,  what I didn't understand  was how 

A) anyone could believe that Ginny would/could that (let alone DD, 
who wouldn't have let the story out) - although he wasn't there was 
he? Yes he was cos the committee reinstated him when Ginny was taken 
into the Chamber. ('Scuse my ramblings, thinking out loud!)

B) When Ginny was taken into the Chamber McGonagall didn't say, 'Oh 
no! Ginny's been taken into the Chamber, it must have been her 
killing everyone!  Why would Ginny go from Victim to Culprit?  If she 
had been killed why would anyone think it was her? Was her that 
killed herself???????? Doesn't make sense to me.  Even if the diary 
was found next to her, nothing is written in it! An empty book is 
enough to *incriminate* her?   DD said that not many knew Tom Riddle 
= LV so it's doubtful that anyone would make that connection!

It just doesn't add up!  But thanks for trying!!