How did Sirius lure Severus into the Willow? (was: James the Berk?)
huntergreen_3
patientx3 at aol.com
Sun Jul 18 22:18:51 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 106805
Potioncat:
>> I just realized your point was that Snape isn't working on a life
debt obligation, he's protecting Harry out of general sense of
duty. Actually, that makes it even more noble (Did you intend that?)
Do I recall that you don't agree with DD's statement about the Life
Debt? I may have to find time to look into that...it is the sort of
dis-information DD might hand out. <<
HunterGreen:
Yes, I don't really agree with Dumbledore's assesment of 'life-debt'
in the case of Snape and James (and actually in the case of a *real*
life debt, with Peter and Harry, I have yet to understand why its
considered "magic", since Peter is for the most part ignoring it).
And yes, that does make Snape more 'noble' when it comes to saving
Harry. I just don't see Snape as the type who would be trying to save
Harry only out of loyalty to a life-debt he had with Harry's
*father*, who is dead. Because the implication there, is that without
the life-debt he would just let Harry fall off his broom in SS/PS,
even though he figured out that *someone* was jinxing it (which the
rest of the teachers weren't bright enough to figure out, or at least
not proactive enough to do anything about).
I think that *Dumbledore* may perceive there to be a debt between
Snape and James, but I haven't seen any proof that *Snape* thinks
this. In PoA, when Harry brings up the prank incident, Snape doesn't
seem to think James was being heroic at all, which makes it hard to
believe that he feels he 'owes' James for it.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive