Theory on James and Lilly Potters occupations
arrowsmithbt
arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com
Sun Jul 25 17:23:45 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 107657
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "snow15145" <snow15145 at y...> wrote:
> Snape had been teaching for 14 years as of book 5, which means that
> he became a teacher the year that the Potters were killed because
> Harry was 15 in this same book.
>
> Lily's wand was exceptional for charm use so I suppose that would
> mean that it was her forte. James' wand was exceptional for
> transfiguration and he was capable of transforming himself by being
> an animagus just like McGonnagall who is the transfiguration teacher.
Kneasy:
Bit of an exaggeration there.
According to Ollivander Lily's wand was - "Nice wand for charm work,"
while James was "excellent for transfiguration," which in my reading
means 'best suited for' rather than exceptional.
I think that the reason DD took on Snape was for the same reason that
he took on Trelawney - part protection, partly to keep a close eye on
him. Don't forget, he'd been working for the Order for 2 years or more
by that time.
The Potters could have been teachers at Hogwarts but I think it unlikely
that Harry could have been there for 5 years and have no-one mention
the fact. I can't see a reason why it should be kept a secret. Minerva'd
liked them as students and they'd been great favourites of Hagrid - and
he's never been able to keep his mouth shut.
What would be the point of keeping it from Harry?
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive