[HPforGrownups] Mothers and Fathers (was: Re: James gave his life, why no protection from him?)
Janet Anderson
norek_archives2 at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 26 21:46:54 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 107772
SSSusan sssaid:
>You know, Iggy, this makes me think of another of my pet peeves in
>this general subject area. HOW many people have suggested that
>*Molly* will betray The Order because of her love/concern for one of
>her children? And then contrast that to how many people have
>suggested that *Arthur* will betray The Order in the same
>fashion.... Interesting, isn't it?
>
>If someone wants to argue that there is something in Molly's
>*specific* temperament which makes this likely AND that that same
>thing is *NOT* in Arthur's specific temperament, then I'll listen.
Okay, I'll argue that, because it's what I said before after Molly showed us
her ugly side in OotP.
Arthur's theme in my opinion is "I could not love thee, dear, so muchl/loved
I not honor more." (quoting from memory). That's why he jumped all over
Percy when he brought home his promotion -- he realized the long view, that
Percy would be asked to betray his family for the money and prestige the
Ministry was offering. He also realizes that in a war, things are different
than in time of peace; any person who wants to fight and can fight should at
least be given some part in it, because you need everyone you can get.
Lastly, he realizes that someone *will* die during a war, and that even if
you're willing to die yourself to protect others, you may not be granted
that wish.
Molly, in my opinion, takes the limited or short view. She hasn't, I think,
realized the whole ramifications of Percy's departure -- she's still
focussing on his leaving his family -- not on his transferring his loyalty
to the corrupt Ministry and all that implies. She's still trying
desperately to run her life and her children's lives as if it were
peacetime. And she hasn't been able to put aside her determination to
protect people who neither need nor want to be protected (Fred and George),
nor to gauge how much protection even underage people should have when
they're in a wartime situation (Ron, Ginny, and of course Harry).
There are things Arthur wouldn't do, even to protect his children, because
he can see past that desire to the war as a whole. In my opinion, Molly is
not at this point able to do that. This may be because of her two dead
brothers in the last war. However, by the description of their deaths, she
should be proud of them and point to them as role models, instead of trying
to wrap up her children in swaddling clothes.
If Voldemort or his agents are looking for a weak link, they may well choose
Molly and threaten her through one of her children -- I think Percy is the
most likely since they've got him where they want him and Molly knows this.
I don't *know* whether or not she would fold under such pressure, but I
think it's much more likely than Arthur doing so. For one thing, Molly
might well be capable of convincing herself that Voldemort would keep his
word. Not Arthur, not for one moment.
Janet Anderson
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive