Snape's part in death of Sirius - Revised Time
nkafkafi
nkafkafi at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 31 20:32:36 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 108308
Asian_lovr2 wrote:
Listed below are several HINDSIGHT solutions. They are very easy
speculations after the fact, but we must judge Snape's actions based
on what he knew at the time, and then temper what he knew with his
personality and his attitude toward Harry <snip>
Neri:
Erm... yes, I might have exercised a bit of hindsight there. That
wasn't my intension. I don't think Snape should have foreseen LV's
plot. I never accused Snape of lacking foresight (except when
discussing those speculations that suggest he had enough data for
it). I do accuse Snape of being irresponsible, mislaying Harry for
several hours while knowing that he (Snape) is the last Order member
at Hogwarts, and therefore responsible for Harry's security.
Snape responsibility here is very similar to Mundungus'
responsibility for the Dementors attack in the beginning of the year.
They both let Harry out of their sight. The motives were different:
in Dung's case it was greed and in Snape's case it was dislike for
Harry, probably coupled with his reluctance to ask for assistance
from Sirius or Lupin. The fault was the same. Dung was luckier,
though: the Dementors attack didn't cause any lasting damage. But
imagine that Sirius would have appeared at the last moment to fight
the Dementors and killed as a result. Would you have then said that
Mundungus shares some responsibility for Sirius' death? I would.
Snape comes out of this comparison even worse than Dung. Dung left
his watch for no more than an hour, when all was well and quiet in
Little Whinging. There was no sign that anything is wrong. But when
Snape left his watch he knew that Harry had just had a mind contact
with LV, he is under a wrong impression that Sirius is in great
danger, and Umbridge is trying to squeeze sensitive information out
of him. A bad time to leave your watch for several hours.
Moreover, Snape's case was after Mundungus' case. The Order already
had a striking demonstration how dangerous it is to leave Harry
unguarded. And indeed they watch him very faithfully for the whole
year. Until Snape's watch.
I don't accuse Dung of lack of foresight either. He certainly
couldn't have foreseen that Umbridge will send Dementors to
assassinate Harry. Snape couldn't have foreseen that LV will lure
Harry to the DoM and that Harry will find the Thestrals in the
forest. Both of them should have kept their eyes on Harry for a
single reason: it was their duty.
Neri
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive