Hogwarts a nice place? (Was Re: The Movie vs. JKR?)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Tue Jun 8 15:14:27 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 100400
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dan"
<darkthirty at s...> wrote:
>In Rowling, that is to say, the muggle world is an exaggerated
world (at least, through the home life of the Dursleys), and the
magical world is a fair reflection of all the problems of the real
world. That is her inversion. <
Petunia and Vernon have done their best to pretend that Privet
Drive is a fairy tale world--a great, good place where good
children, ie Dudley, are never punished, you can watch TV and
play video games as much as you like, and eat whenever you
care to, everything is always clean, the lawn and garden are kept
bright in defiance of law and nature, the scut work is done by an
invisible servant (Harry), and scandal only happens to
other people. We see the cost, first to Harry but also to the
Dursleys themselves, of maintaining such an illusion.
But Hogwarts, even in Book One, was never like that. The
Gryffindor common room with its shabby armchairs was never
the tapestry-clad wonder that we saw in the movie. The innocent
suffered and died. And for all the romance of its towers and
turrets, the castle is and always has been a fortress and a tool
of war, its corridors booby-trapped and its animated suits of
armor standing vigil in the halls.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive