Buckbeak's Execution and Other Questions
Barbara
bd-bear at verizon.net
Tue Jun 8 22:21:04 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 100470
>>>Maggie Barclay <rzl46 at y...> wrote:
. . . In other words, was Buckbeak really executed the first time
and then the time turner brought him back to life or did he not
really die the first time (because HH were already there to rescue
him)? The argument was made that as HRH didn't SEE Buckbeak
executed, merely heard the thud, it was possible that they heard
some other noise and interpreted it to mean that Buckbeak was dead.
I liked that the movie answered that question, though probably not
to the satisfaction of everyone in this group ;), by showing the
executioner taking out his frustrations on a poor defenseless
pumpkin.<<<
When I read these scenes originally, I think my reaction was, "Oh,
that's make sense!" When Harry and Hermione heard the executioner
slam down the axe and they already had Buckbeak away from there, it
just explained what happened in the earlier chapter (when they think
Buckbeak is being executed). They also heard Hagrid (his "wild
howling") afterwards, and they assumed he was expressing grief, but
then when H&H went back in time, they see he was howling with tears
of relief. Those parts were actually less confusing to me than the
part with the Patronus. Harry knowing he could create the Patronus
when he went back in time with Hermione, because he "did it before."
That was weird.
To answer your question, I think the book was written in a way that
made me believe there was actually one timeline. The difference was
in what H&H knew. Of course, if they had not gone back because of
what they thought happened, then what they feared (Buckbeak being
killed) would have happened after all. Does that make sense?
Someone else mentioned Star Trek when discussing all this Time
Turner stuff. I'm a big Star Trek fan and that reminded me of this
line, from Star Trek Voyager:
Capt Janeway: Ever since my first day in the job as a Starfleet
Captain I swore I'm never let myself get caught in one of these god-
forsaken paradoxes. The future is the past, the past is the future.
It all gives me a headache.
Barbara
aka bd-bear
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive