Snape's liability
Mel
melaniertay at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 9 23:23:49 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 100610
AF <featheringstonehaugh at y...> wrote:
>
> I suppose everything in life can be somehow linked to everything
else if the connection is stretched enough, but I don't accept the
argument that discontinuation of the lessons was responsible in any
way for Sirius' death. It was Harry's inability or unwillingness to
cooperate and his hostility toward Snape that held him back. Harry
had been told of the importance of the lessons; he knew it was in
his own interest to master the art and that this was not being done
for amusement and yet... Sure Snape ended the lessons - but even
if he hadn't, there's no indication that Harry would have cooperated
any more than he already had. Without practice, his progress would
have stalled, leaving him with that dangerous "little bit of
knowledge" we all know about. Innate ability may have been there,
but mastery required effort on Harry's part, and effort was
something he just couldn't put forth.. Snape couldn't make Harry
learn, he could only teach - the rest was up to Harry, who couldn't
or
> wouldn't accept what was offered.
I'm new here and loving this discussion. It's very interesting. I
thought I'd add my 2 cents.
Personally, I think if you can't see Snape's discontinuation of
lessons as responsible for Sirius' death, than you can't really see
Harry's inability to master it (for whatever reason) as responsible
either. Snape is who he is and because of this even Dumbledore
knows it was a mistake to have him teach Harry. Harry is a fifteen
year old boy that does thoughtless things sometimes. Hardly news
worthy. Harry is also a pawn of the wizarding world. He has no
real obligation to do anything for the wizarding world. Half of me
would like to see him run away to America or something. To me it's
heroic that he stays. A prophecy made by a quack is hardly reason
to think Harry should suddenly metamorphosis into a perfect person
out of "responsibility". He's a kid (allbeit a fictional one).
I think trusting Snape is probably a mistake, but who knows? He
could be a great guy deep down. The reason Sirius is dead is
because there is a war going on. In war, people die. I think it's
quite inappropriate to assign blame in such a situation to anything,
but the war. I'm sure there are people that were in real wars that
could have made a better decision here or there and saved someone's
life. Is it right to go back 5 degrees from Kevin Bacon and then
hate them for a bad decision they could not have known the outcome
of?
"Mel"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive