Blame, blame, blame....
koinonia02
Koinonia2 at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 21 19:34:12 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 102291
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Silverthorne"
<silverthorne.dragon at v...> wrote:
>Tell me then, where the blame stops, and the hate begins....?
"K":
I'm sure not trying to get anything started again but I haven't been
able to reply until now. I have read very few of the posts since all
the blame game started. But again I do that so I can continue to
love most all the characters and enjoy the books. I don't like to
argue just for the sake of it. I don't find that fun at all. If
others do that's fine. As I mentioned before, I'm more interested in
clues and theories.
I don't understand most of the hate. I can't understand why one
character is loved regardless of when their actions are not
acceptable and yet another character is never, ever allowed to have
one flaw. I believe when that happens it clouds the ability to look
at the story in an objective way. Of course I never have that
problem ^-~
silverthorne:
>Do you honestly know what's going on with these characters, and
>*WHY they do certian things?
"K":
That's right. There's really so little information we have on most
of the characters.
Annemehr:
>I'm not for excusing Harry for the times he has no excuse, either,
>but I do think a lot of people blame Harry too much for how the
>Occlumency lessons went (and didn't go).
"K"
I honestly don't want to discuss the Occlumency blame game again
because none of us are going to change. :-) Yet I think the
Occlumency parts are very interesting and there are loads of little
hints in those exhanges between Snape and Harry but we can't seem to
get to them. For instance, what about the part where Snape asks
Harry about the dog? Seems like a strange thing to ask about and
Snape doesn't ask many questions. So why is he so interested in the
owner of the dog? Well, many people believe this is nothing more
than Snape taking an opportunity to have a laugh at the expense of
Harry. One can't have a theory discussion about the dog and owner
because even that turns into Snape hating.
But the problem isn't just with Harry and Occlumency. It's with
Harry and whatever else he does that might be wrong. Some folks are
blinded by Harry Love and make excuses for the boy. If anyone dares
to challenge Harry's actions then one is labeled a Harry Hater which
just isn't always the case. Surely I have the right to say I don't
like it when Harry tells a lie or once again does not listen to what
he is told. That doesn't mean I hate the kid. Far from it. I feel
for Harry a great deal and only want the best for him. He's a good
but imperfect person.
Annemehr:
>There's one more very important statement from Dumbledore in that
>chapter:
>Dumbledore: "I have already said that it was a mistake for me not to
>teach you myself, though I was sure, at the time, that nothing could
>have been more dangerous than to **open your mind even further to
>Voldemort** while in my presence --" [emphasis mine]
"K"
Dear Dumbledore. He also makes mistakes.
I left out some other good points you made only because I think it
will take us back to the blame game again.
Annemehr:
>As for a connection between Harry and Snape, my mind is open, but so
>far I don't think so, if you mean something akin to the scar
>connection between Harry and LV. If you mean that their relationship
>will be important, then I agree. There's also the fact that Harry
>knows Snape knows Occlumency and Legilimency, which may be put to
>better use someday.
>And yes, I agree Harry may have learned more Occlumency than anyone
>realises.
"K":
I honestly don't know what the connection could be but I just think
there's more to it than what we see on the surface. That's what I'm
interested in.
I must also say that I don't believe for one moment that Snape
couldn't put aside his feelings and that he would put the Order or
Harry's life in jeopardy. That is not what we have seen from Snape.
Snape appears to be a man on a mission and he's not going to risk
throwing it all away. I believe Snape ended those lessons because he
was finished with what needed to be done. Harry just doesn't know
yet all he can do.
Now a couple of other items. I don't believe I must like Harry the
most since the story is about him. I can think of other stories
where I've liked secondary characters better than the main. I don't
see any problem with that.
If I say I would love to see a few good kids in Slytherin house,
that doesn't mean I stand for evil. It's the hope that some kids
will stand for what is right. It's the hope that there are other
Slytherin adults that have taken the stand for goodness but we don't
know who they are yet.
Maybe I'm different from most of the people here but I can still
enjoy the great amount of humor in the books. I can just sit and
read the books and not think of all our theories and all our blame,
etc. I can just sit and enjoy a good read. I don't intend to lose
that.
"K"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive