Pensieve in Court & Magic Eye
mnaper2001
mnaperrone at aol.com
Tue Jun 22 03:09:13 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 102369
Alina:
> Actually, I think that the Pensieve wouldn't be reliable enough. It
seems to
> me of the family of magic to which Occlumency and Legilimency also
belong.
> Now we know that Voldemort was able to "fabricate" a memory and let
somebody
> else access it (or force it on somebody else) through a kind of
> Legilimency/Occlumency over distance bond. So, I suspect, that it's
actually
> possible to feed fake and fabricated memories into the Pensieve as
well.
>
> By the way, to me that also means that it's possible the memories
Harry saw
> in Snape and in his pensieve weren't a hundred percent true either.
Ally:
Well, the impression I get is that the pensieve shows everything,
even the things you may not conciously be aware of your memory
recording. So, if I walk into a room to get a book, I might be
focused only on the book and remember only the book, but in fact, my
senses would be taking in a lot more that I mentally discard b/c its
not important to me at the time. The pensieve allows you to see
everything that happened, even the things you weren't aware you saw.
Why would DD use it as a tool to gain better insights into events if
it was an unreliable recording? I think it brings your memories into
clearer and more accurate focus.
And remember, Sirius and Lupin admit that the Marauders were the
aggressors in Snape's pensieve scene when Harry confronts them about
it. If I remember correctly, Sirius makes light of it, which kind of
peeves Harry, but they basically explain that they were young and
foolish.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive