Why did Snape teach Occlumency?/Snapes Trustworthiness
sonjaaiston
sonjaaiston at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 30 02:30:55 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 103544
Why did Snape teach Harry Occlumency in OofP?
This is something that has been bothering me. I usually don't post
b/c I'm afraid the topic I want to discuss has been discussed ad
nauseam. I hope this already hasn't been completely hashed out:
My understanding is: Dumbledore didn't want to teach Harry
Occlumency b/c he didn't want LV to see how close he was to Harry.
So he had to find someone else. Snape was excellent, so he was
chosen to teach Harry. BUT, my problem is, isn't it just as
dangerous for LV to see Snape close to Harry? Wouldn't LV put
pressure on Snape to intefere with Harry. Wouldn't LV question
Snape's loyalty if he saw Snape helping Harry? Is it possible that
Harry did not succeed with Occlumency b/c Snape didn't want LV to
see Harry succeed? Maybe this was just a way for Snape to show
his "loyalty" to LV so he could continue his "double agent" work.
(Though, if that is the case, it is trully shameful that Harry was
not warned about the prophecy and LV intentions.)
Snape's Trustworthiness:
Aside from the above topic, I'm am beginning to think Snape will end
up being a traitor to Dumbledore ---- only b/c we have been told so
many times (by Hermione and Dumbledore) that he is on Dumbledore's
side. Harry and Ron have suspected Snape many times only to find
out they were wrong. It seems JKR might be giving us a "false sense
of security."
Any thoughts?
Sonja
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive