Snape NOT a Vampire (Was The Marauders are all Gryffindors)
Diana_Sirius_fan
siriuslove71 at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 5 03:29:51 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 92150
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Tanya Swaine <swaine.t at x> wrote:
> At 15:16 5/03/2004, you wrote:
>
> >Diana Wrote:
> >
> >JKR said, "Erm..I don't think so" when asked if there was a
> >correlation between Snape and Vampires. This is JKR speak we are
> >talking about. The "Erm... I don't think so" is not saying ,"No,
> >Snape is not a Vampire." She still could be tricking us. She is
> >saying she doesn't think so but that still leaves a little room
> >for "yes, he might me." I will only take my hat off after book 7
is
> >over and it concludes with Snape not being a vamp. Up until then I
> >still think it is possible. Diana
>
>
> Tanya now.
>
> I'm on the fence with this one, undecided either way. But I would
of liked
> for the answer to be
> a strong yes or no. However, she could be unsure as to what a the
link
> asked of in the question
> could mean. I'm not even sure myself.
>
> Tanya
>
Yes, I would have liked a clear cut answer also. She easily could
have said yes or no. If she would have answered like she did some of
the other questions it may have given too much away. If she would
have said, "Wait and see" then we would assume there was a
connection. If she would have said, "there is absolutely no
connection between Snape and Vampires" then we would know there was
not. She answers it as "I don't think so" which is neither a yes or
a no, so we can still think that maybe there is a connection. I just
do not see how others saw her answer as a "there is no way Snape is a
Vampire" because that is not what was said. Diana
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive