SHIP: Harry and Hermione
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Mar 6 17:44:12 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 92329
Samnanya:
>>(re Pippin)
I never thought I would disagree with Pippin because her
theories, whether ultimately right or wrong, are always well
thought out. <<
Thank you ! :-)
Samnanya:
>> But this time.....
I am curious what you mean by "I think Harry would be happier
in a more equal relationship, myself."? More equal than what?
There is a balance in Harry/Hermione that is evident in all of their
exploits. Harry respects her opinion, which is more based on
her Ravenclaw tendencies than her Griffindor ones. She cares
for Harry greatly - much more than as a friend, and the feeling is
mutual. When she is injured at the MOM Harry is nearly
paralyzed with brainlock. His powerful response when Neville
says that he feels a pulse is both intensely physical and
emotional. <<
Pippin:
Unequal doesn't have to mean exploitative. Their relationship is
obviously equally beneficial to both--but she has an influence
over him that he doesn't have over her.
Harry identifies his interior nagger, his superego if you will, as
Hermione. And he needs someone to personify that voice for
him, since he only briefly had a loving parent in his life. That's
fine, as long as he and Hermione aren't romantically involved, or
trying to be. But while it's necessary for people to form an
emotional connection to parent surrogates like coaches and
therapists and *very* easy to identify those feelings with
romantic love, it's usually a bad idea to act on that basis.
The roles are in conflict. The parent, the coach, the therapist,
must ultimately let go, whereas the goal of lovers is to grow ever
closer.
Look at the way Harry lies to avoid Hermione's nagging. If he
thought of himself as her equal, he wouldn't need to do that. He'd
just tell her to shut up already, which is, you'll note, what Ron
does whenever he's had enough.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive