JKR Chat "The Crucial and Central Question"
Renee
R.Vink2 at chello.nl
Sun Mar 7 15:40:40 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 92423
Hello to all of you!
I'm a (relative) newbie: I've been a member of the list for some
time now, but this is my first post, and though I read the first
four HP books several years ago, I didn't become a fan until after
OotP.
I hope I'm not breaking any rules by barging in just like this, but
I felt I had to react.
<greatelderone at y...> wrote:
>if I were Dumbledore killing Lupin would
> have worked better. Fellow's a werewolf and the weakest of the
> original four(in mind) aside from Wormtail.
It seems a bit premature to me to decide that Lupin is expendable or
a liability before we know what kind of missions he was carrying out
for the Order during Year 5. Also, killing Lupin because he's a
werewolf would rather undermine the anti-discriminination theme
running through the series. If DD were to rid himself of Lupin for
that reason, wouldn't he be worse than Umbridge, and little better
than Voldemort?
The worst liability among the order members, IMO, is not Lupin (or
Sirius, for that matter), but Mundungus Fletcher. If Harry hadn't
been capable of summoning a Patronus - something Lupin taught him! -
Dung's lack of vigilance would have had disastrous results. But all
he gets is a scolding. Personally, I think the Order has too few
members for any of them to be expendable, whether they're highly
competent wizards/witches, or squibs like Arabella Figg.
Finally, I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "weak in mind" -
do you mean Lupin's not very competent as a wizard, or stupid, or
that he doesn't have a strong personality?
Renee
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive