Why didn't Lily have to die?
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Mar 20 02:55:13 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 93467
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "justcarol67"
<justcarol67 at y...> wrote:
> > Carol:
> > <<<What *I* don't understand is how he could have thought
that *any* mother would stand aside and let him kill her
baby.>>>
<snip>
> Yes, I'm very much aware that LV can't comprehend either love
or emotion in general and I'm familiar with the quotes you cited
andtheir implications.
<snip more>
> But still, on an intellectual level, he should understand that
mothers in general will protect their babies. Even the animal
mothers he must have seen in the wild will fight for their young, if
not from love then from a natural instinct that he could interpret
as something mechanical or selfish but nevertheless
undeniable real. It seems incredibly dense to expect any mother
to just step aside so he could kill her child, or to see such a
gesture as "silly."<<
But, as someone pointed out not long ago in the morality
thread,the mother who will fight to the death to defend her
young from predators will nonetheless allow them to be killed by
more dominant members of her own species, a behavior which
is, unfortunately, also observable among humans. Having slain
her mate, Voldemort expects Lily to submit, not fight.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive