Dumbledores lack of surprise + my point !
Inge
Elvishooked at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 25 15:33:54 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 93922
Ah, so stupid of me ... I totally forgot to put my main point about
Dumbledore's lack of surprise (knowledge) in my previous post.
To continue from where I left:
OOTP, p 737 uk edition.
Dumbledore: "But she (Petunia) took you", Dumbledore cut across
him. "She may have taken you grudgingly, furiously, unwillingly,
bitterly, yet still she took you, and in doing so, she sealed the
charm I placed upon you. Your mother's sacrifice made the bond of
blood the strongest shield I could give you."
Ok - so how DID Dumbledore know anything about Lily's sacrifice at
that time? Harry was a little more than a year old and the only
person to tell what had happened at his home that night. Not a chance.
Alas! Someone else must have been in the house to witness what
happened and told Dumbledore that Lily actually gave her life for
Harry. Who?
And so, Dumbledore must have lied to Minerva when he told her that he
didn't know how Harry had survived the attack.
Inge
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive