Harry, Snape,Occlumency
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at sbcglobal.net
Wed Mar 31 01:45:12 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 94594
> Carol, who thinks that the anti-Snape faction should make up its
> mind whether to blame him for the way he taught Occlumency *or*
> for ending the lessons. It's neither fair nor logical to blame him
> for both.
Well, I surely don't consider myself in any anti-Snape faction [he's
one of my favorite characters and I admire many things about him],
but I have certainly been a vocal opponent of his teaching style, at
least as it is concerns Harry, Neville & Hermione. I sure would
love to hear why it's incongruous to disagree w/ his Occlumency
*methods* AND to be angry with him for ending the lessons. I must
be missing something obvious--??
I think Snape could have done a better job at the very beginning of
the occlumency lessons, as I've described ad nauseum, but I don't
quite see how saying that means that I "can't" be upset that he
kicked Harry out and stopped the lessons. In my mind, there was
always room both for Harry to become a better, more dedicated
occlumency student and for Snape to try a bit of a different tack in
teaching him.
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive